Abnormalities of structural brain connectivity in pediatric brain tumor survivors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Pediatric brain tumor survivors are at an increased risk for white matter (WM) injury. However, damage to whole-brain structural connectivity is unelucidated. The impact of treatment on WM connectivity was investigated. Methods Whole-brain WM networks were derived from diffusion tensor imaging data acquired for 28 irradiated patients (radiotherapy, RT) (mean age = 13.74 ± 3.32 years), 13 patients not irradiated (No RT) (mean age = 12.57 ± 2.87), and 41 typically developing children (TDC) (mean age = 13.32 ± 2.92 years). Differences in network properties were analyzed using robust regressions. Results Participation coefficient was lower in both patient groups (RT: adj. P = .015; No RT: adj. P = .042). Compared to TDC, RT had greater clustering (adj. P = .015), local efficiency (adj. P = .003), and modularity (adj. P = .000003). WM traced from hubs was damaged in patients: left hemisphere pericallosal sulcus (FA [F = 4.97; q < 0.01]; MD [F = 11.02; q < 0.0001]; AD [F = 10.00; q < 0.0001]; RD [F = 8.53; q < 0.0001]), right hemisphere pericallosal sulcus (FA [F = 8.87; q < 0.0001]; RD [F = 8.27; q < 0.001]), and right hemisphere parietooccipital sulcus (MD [F = 5.78; q < 0.05]; RD [F = 5.12; q < 0.05]). Conclusions Findings indicate greater segregation of WM networks after RT. Intermodular connectivity was lower after treatment with and without RT. No significant network differences were observed between patient groups. Our results are discussed in the context of a network approach that emphasizes interactions between brain regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it