Abnormalities of structural brain connectivity in pediatric brain tumor survivors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Pediatric brain tumor survivors are at an increased risk for white matter (WM) injury. However, damage to whole-brain structural connectivity is unelucidated. The impact of treatment on WM connectivity was investigated. Methods Whole-brain WM networks were derived from diffusion tensor imaging data acquired for 28 irradiated patients (radiotherapy, RT) (mean age = 13.74 ± 3.32 years), 13 patients not irradiated (No RT) (mean age = 12.57 ± 2.87), and 41 typically developing children (TDC) (mean age = 13.32 ± 2.92 years). Differences in network properties were analyzed using robust regressions. Results Participation coefficient was lower in both patient groups (RT: adj. P = .015; No RT: adj. P = .042). Compared to TDC, RT had greater clustering (adj. P = .015), local efficiency (adj. P = .003), and modularity (adj. P = .000003). WM traced from hubs was damaged in patients: left hemisphere pericallosal sulcus (FA [F = 4.97; q < 0.01]; MD [F = 11.02; q < 0.0001]; AD [F = 10.00; q < 0.0001]; RD [F = 8.53; q < 0.0001]), right hemisphere pericallosal sulcus (FA [F = 8.87; q < 0.0001]; RD [F = 8.27; q < 0.001]), and right hemisphere parietooccipital sulcus (MD [F = 5.78; q < 0.05]; RD [F = 5.12; q < 0.05]). Conclusions Findings indicate greater segregation of WM networks after RT. Intermodular connectivity was lower after treatment with and without RT. No significant network differences were observed between patient groups. Our results are discussed in the context of a network approach that emphasizes interactions between brain regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".