Use of Milk Infrared Spectral Data as Environmental Covariates in Genomic Prediction Models for Production Traits in Canadian Holstein
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to provide a procedure for the inclusion of milk spectral information into genomic prediction models. Spectral data were considered a set of covariates, in addition to genomic covariates. Milk yield and somatic cell score were used as traits to investigate. A cross-validation was employed, making a distinction for predicting new individuals' performance under known environments, known individuals' performance under new environments, and new individuals' performance under new environments. We found an advantage of including spectral data as environmental covariates when the genomic predictions had to be extrapolated to new environments. This was valid for both observed and, even more, unobserved families (genotypes). Overall, prediction accuracy was larger for milk yield than somatic cell score. Fourier-transformed infrared spectral data can be used as a source of information for the calculation of the 'environmental coordinates' of a given farm in a given time, extrapolating predictions to new environments. This procedure could serve as an example of integration of genomic and phenomic data. This could help using spectral data for traits that present poor predictability at the phenotypic level, such as disease incidence and behavior traits. The strength of the model is the ability to couple genomic with high-throughput phenomic information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".