Practice Patterns of Palmoplantar Pustulosis: Patient Demographics and Treatment Options
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic skin condition characterized by sterile pustules on the palms and soles. This condition is more commonly reported among women and smokers causing considerable discomfort and interference with daily activities. Although there are various off-label treatment options available for PPP, there remains a demand to identify more effective and safer treatments. Objective: To review the patient demographics and treatment patterns of our PPP patient population. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed at a dermatology office with two locations in Ontario, Canada. Results: We identified 71 adult PPP patients. A third of patients did not return for follow up after diagnosis. Among those who returned for follow-up, 20% were managed with topical therapy alone. Of our patients who took systemic treatment for PPP, apremilast, followed by ustekinumab and guselkumab, had the greatest retention of therapy. Conclusion: Targeting PDE4, IL-12/23 and IL-23 provided some benefit for our patients with PPP leading to greatest retention of therapy over time. Further investigation is required into the cause for high no-show rates and the search for effective and safe treatment options.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".