Prediction of the post‐failure behavior of rocks: Combining artificial intelligence and acoustic emission sensing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Acoustic emission (AE) reading is among the most common methods for monitoring the behavior of brittle materials such as rock and concrete. This study uses discrete element method (DEM) simulations to explore the correlations between the pre‐failure AE readings with the post‐failure behavior and residual strength of rock masses. The deep learning (DL) method based on long short‐term memory (LSTM) algorithms has been applied to generate predictive models based on the data from DEM simulations of biaxial compression. The dataset has been populated by varying interparticle friction while keeping bond cohesion constant. Various configurations of the LSTM algorithm were evaluated considering different scenarios for input features (strain, stress, and AE energy records) and a range of values for the key hyperparameters. The prime AI models show promising accuracy in predicting residual strength decay with strain based on pre‐failure patterns in AE readings. The results indicate that the pre‐failure AE indeed encapsulates information about the developing failure mechanisms and the post‐failure response in rocks, which can be captured through artificial intelligence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".