MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229030011 · doi:10.1145/3477314.3507101

OpenFlow rule placement in carrier networks for augmented reality applications

2022· article· en· W4229030011 on OpenAlexaff
Rafael George Amado, Mohamed Cheriet

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 37th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpenFlowComputer scienceComputer networkSoftware-defined networkingMulticastUnicastCacheDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Today, mobile consumers increasingly use Augmented Reality (AR) devices to stream personal video through carrier networks. Thanks to its flexibility, Software-Defined Networking (SDN) is deployed in many carrier networks to support end-to-end network-slicing, which is substantial for these AR applications. In an OpenFlow-enabled SDN network, a controller must decide the rules to be placed into the switches in the network, subject to multiple constraints such as memory capacity, link bandwidth limitation, and flow continuity. Due to legacy switch models, prior work focuses only on unicast flows which cannot efficiently support AR applications with streaming traffic from one a source device (or server) to many destination devices across the network. In this paper, we optimize rule placement in resource-constrained Openflow networks for both unicast and multicast flows. Our approach is to leverage the use of Group Tables, which is recently introduced in the Open-Flow 1.1 specification, to support multicast flows and, at the same time, save switch memory. Traffic to multiple destinations can be aggregated to match a single flow table entry per switch. Therefore, significant link resources can be saved. The experimental results on three different topologies show our solution can support a higher number of flows than the state-of-the-art solutions by reducing both the link usage by up to 30% and the number of flow entries needed to deliver the traffic to destinations by 22%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 37th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied ComputingSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207