MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229030319 · doi:10.1155/2022/8995358

5-Year Survivorship and Outcomes of Robotic-Arm-Assisted Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

2022· article· en· W4229030319 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Bionics and Biomechanics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUnicompartmental knee arthroplastyWOMACOsteoarthritisPerioperativeArthroplastyCohortSurvivorship curveOxford knee scorePhysical therapySurgeryPopulationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose. While unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has demonstrated benefits over total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in selected populations, component placement continues to be challenging with conventional surgical instruments, resulting in higher early failure rates. Robotic-arm-assisted UKA (RA-UKA) has shown to be successful in component positioning through preop planning and intraop adjustability. The purpose of this study is to assess the 5-year clinical outcomes of medial RA-UKA. Methods. This study was a retrospective review of a single-center prospectively maintained cohort of 133 patients (146 knees) indicated for medial UKA from 2009 to 2013. Perioperative data and 2- and 5-year Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Score (WOMAC), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) outcome measures were collected. Five-year follow-up was recorded in 119 patients (131 knees). Results. Mean follow-up was <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"> <a:mn>5.1</a:mn> <a:mo>±</a:mo> <a:mn>0.2</a:mn> </a:math> years. Mean age and BMI were <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2"> <c:mn>68.0</c:mn> <c:mo>±</c:mo> <c:mn>8.1</c:mn> </c:math> years and <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3"> <e:mn>29.3</e:mn> <e:mo>±</e:mo> <e:mn>4.7</e:mn> </e:math> kg/m2, respectively. At 2-year follow-up, mean KOOS, WOMAC, and FJS were <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M4"> <g:mn>71.5</g:mn> <g:mo>±</g:mo> <g:mn>15.3</g:mn> </g:math> , <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M5"> <i:mn>14.3</i:mn> <i:mo>±</i:mo> <i:mn>7.9</i:mn> </i:math> , and <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M6"> <k:mn>79.1</k:mn> <k:mo>±</k:mo> <k:mn>25.8</k:mn> </k:math> , respectively. At 5-year follow-up, mean KOOS, WOMAC, and FJS were <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M7"> <m:mn>71.6</m:mn> <m:mo>±</m:mo> <m:mn>15.2</m:mn> </m:math> , <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M8"> <o:mn>14.2</o:mn> <o:mo>±</o:mo> <o:mn>7.9</o:mn> </o:math> , and <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M9"> <q:mn>80.9</q:mn> <q:mo>±</q:mo> <q:mn>25.1</q:mn> </q:math> , respectively. Mean change in KOOS and WOMAC was <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M10"> <s:mn>34.6</s:mn> <s:mo>±</s:mo> <s:mn>21.4</s:mn> </s:math> and <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M11"> <u:mn>11.0</u:mn> <u:mo>±</u:mo> <u:mn>13.6</u:mn> </u:math> , respectively ( <w:math xmlns:w="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M12"> <w:mi>p</w:mi> <w:mo>&lt;</w:mo> <w:mn>0.001</w:mn> </w:math> and <y:math xmlns:y="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M13"> <y:mi>p</y:mi> <y:mo>&lt;</y:mo> <y:mn>0.001</y:mn> </y:math> ). For patient satisfaction at last follow-up, 89% of patients were very satisfied/satisfied and 5% were dissatisfied. For patient activity expectations at last follow-up, 85% met activity expectations, 52% were more active than before, 25% have the same level of activity, 23% were less active than before, and 89% were walking without support. All patients returned to driving after surgery at a mean <ab:math xmlns:ab="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M14"> <ab:mn>15.2</ab:mn> <ab:mo>±</ab:mo> <ab:mn>9.4</ab:mn> </ab:math> days. Survivorship was 95% (95% CI 0.91-0.98) at 5 years. One knee (1%) had a patellofemoral revision, two knees (1.3%) were revised to different partial knee replacements, and five knees (3.4%) were converted to TKA. Conclusion. Overall, medial RA-UKA demonstrated improved patient-recorded outcomes, high patient satisfaction, met expectations, and excellent functional recovery. Midterm survivorship was excellent. Longitudinal follow-up is needed to evaluate long-term outcomes of robotic-arm-assisted UKA procedures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.461
Threshold uncertainty score0.889

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it