Severe papilledema and multiple hypercoagulability abnormalities in patient with dural arterio-venous fistulas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 54-year-old man noticed right-sided pulsatile tinnitus for the past six months and recently started experiencing transient visual obscurations when standing up. MRI demonstrated two separate brain dural arteriovenous fistulas (bdAVF) in sagittal and right sigmoid dural sinuses. Neuro-ophthalmological exam demonstrated severe bilateral optic disc edema with preserved visual acuity but early nerve fiber bundle defects on visual field testing. Hypercoagulable profile testing revealed very elevated D-dimer, significantly decreased protein S level and elevated homocysteine levels. This case highlights importance of referring all patients with bdAVFs for neuro-ophthalmological consultation as venous hypertension can cause increased intracranial pressure and resultant papilledema. Papilledema does not affect central vision until late stages when visual loss is irreversible thus screening for its presence and pre-treatment extent of peripheral visual loss is paramount. It also demonstrates that hypercoagulable workup should be initiated in all patients with bdAVF in order to prevent future thromboembolic events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".