MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparative evaluation of Holstein bulls-producers of different breeding on the productive qualities of daughters

2022· article· en· W4229032345 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAgrarian Bulletin of the · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLactationAnimal scienceIce calvingMilkingInseminationBiologyArtificial inseminationProductivityReproductionProgeny testingSelection (genetic algorithm)PregnancyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Purpose. Comparative assessment of productive qualities of cows-daughters of Holstein bulls-producers of different breeding. Methods. Milk productivity was assessed by the method of control milking, milk quality indicators – by the instrument method on the Lactan-1M device, reproductive qualities – by conventional methods. Results. The age of the first insemination influenced the age of the first fruitful insemination and the first calving. Earlier, calving took place for 6 to 9 months in heifers obtained from bulls of Russian and Dutch breeding – Alaska and Davis. The live weight of the repair heifers at the first insemination was almost the same. A higher live weight of the first insemination was in heifers-daughters of bulls Aurora and Relayble. Cows-daughters of bulls-producers of Aurora (Canadian breeding) and Alaska (domestic breeding) were distinguished by lower productivity. They had milk yields for 305 days of lactation and for the entire first lactation lower than the daughters of bulls-producers of Dutch and American breeding – Davis and Relayble. The productive longevity of cows-daughters of all evaluated bulls-producers is slightly more than one lactation 1.0 (Alaska bull) – 1.3 lactation (Aurora bull). According to MFF (mass fraction of fat) and MFP (mass fraction of protein) in milk, the milk of the daughters of the Davis producer bull of the Dutch selection was distinguished by the best indicators. Their MFF in milk was higher by 0.02–0.18 % and MFP by 0.19–0.22 %. The duration of the service period ranges from 101 days (Alaska) to 157 days (Davis). The coefficient of reproductive ability of cows in all groups of cows-daughters was below the optimal 0.95, which indicates problems with reproduction in groups of daughters of bulls of Holstein bulls of different breeding. The daughters of the Alaska bull of the domestic selection had the best CRC indicators (reproductive ability coefficient), and the lowest in the group of the daughters of the Dutch selection Davis bull. Scientific novelty. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the fact that a comprehensive assessment of the economic and useful qualities of the daughters of Holstein bulls of different breeding was carried out and their further use was determined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.481
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it