Francophonie et sciences sociales en Roumanie post-communiste. Convergences et recompositions autour de l’École doctorale régionale de Bucarest (1994-2007)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir de sources d’archives inédites, le texte retrace l’articulation entre les logiques académique, diplomatique et francophone qui ont été à la base de la fondation et du fonctionnement de l’École doctorale régionale en sciences sociales de Bucarest. Ouverte en 1994, dans le contexte des ateliers de l’EHESS en Europe centrale, l’École doctorale s’en est différenciée grâce à l’implication de l’AUPELF/AUF qui a financé la formation de plus de 250 étudiants et a favorisé la mise en place d’un réseau d’universités francophones de plusieurs pays (Belgique, Canada, France, Suisse). Au début des années 2000, l’AUF a imposé le principe de la régionalisation qui a conduit à des recompositions dans le réseau, par l’ancrage de l’École doctorale au sein de l’Université de Bucarest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.018 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".