MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229064919 · doi:10.5209/cfcg.80752

Antígona, Medea y Lisístrata: tres mujeres con mucho ‘ego’. Una curiosidad sobre la posición de ἐγώ en el trímetro yámbico del teatro griego

2022· article· es· W4229064919 on OpenAlex
Máximo A. García González, Felipe G. Hernández Muñoz

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCuadernos de Filología Clásica Estudios griegos e indoeuropeos · 2022
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiterary and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsCegep de Sept Iles
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesId, ego and super-egoPsychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After an overview of the presence of the pronoun ἐγώ in the iambic trimeter of Greek theater, we analyze its distribution by characters in Antigone, Medea and Lysistrata to try to discover similarities and differences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.478
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it