MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229082130 · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000200293

Multicenter Validation of a Deep Learning Detection Algorithm for Focal Cortical Dysplasia

2022· erratum· en· W4229082130 on OpenAlexaff
Ravnoor Gill, Hyomin Lee, Benoît Caldairou, Seok‐Jun Hong, Carmen Barba, Francesco Deleo, Ludovico D’Incerti, Vanessa Cristina, Mendes Coelho, Matteo Lenge, Mira Semmelroch, Victoria Schrader, Fabrice Bartoloméi, Maxime Guye, Andreas Schulze‐Bonhage, Horst Urbach, Kyoo Ho Cho, Fernando Cendes, Renzo Guerrini, Graeme D. Jackson, R. Edward Hogan, Neda Bernasconi, A Bernasconi

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2022
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsBritish Columbia Children's HospitalMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCortical dysplasiaMulticenter studyDeep learningArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceAlgorithmDysplasiaMedicineMachine learningPathologyRadiologyMagnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the Research Article “Multicenter Validation of a Deep Learning Detection Algorithm for Focal Cortical Dysplasia” by Gill et al.,1 several links to the supplemental content were omitted in the final manuscript. The article has now been replaced by a corrected version with the links included. The original version with the changes highlighted is available from a link in the corrected article. The publisher regrets the omissions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.661

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicRetinal Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207