MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229365969 · doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.03.391

117 Vulvar Pleasure in Chronic Vulvar Pain Conditions: Impacts on Pain-Related Anxiety, Pain Catastrophizing, and Sexual Function

2022· article· en· W4229365969 on OpenAlexaff
Theodora Mautz, J Krapf, A Goldstein

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Sexual Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSexual functionPleasurePsychosocialPain catastrophizingAnxietyMedicinePsychologySexual dysfunctionPhysical therapyPelvic painClinical psychologyChronic painPsychiatrySurgeryInternal medicinePsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Introduction Vulvar pain conditions are associated with pain-related anxiety and other psychosocial symptoms, which can have far-ranging effects on personal well-being and interpersonal relationships. Despite their pain, some vulvar pain patients are still capable of experiencing vulvar pleasure. The relationships between vulvar pain conditions and vulvar pleasure is not well explored in existing literature. Objectives To examine the frequencies with which vulvar pain patients experience vulvar pleasure, and to investigate whether the ability to experience vulvar pleasure in patients with vulvar pain conditions impacts pain-related anxiety (PRA), pain catastrophization (PC), and sexual functioning (SF). Methods A prospective online study was conducted of 262 patients presenting to two urban vulvovaginal specialty clinics over the course of six months. Patients presenting for initial evaluation completed validated questionnaires for PRA via the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale-20 (PASS-20), PC via the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and SF via the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), as well as a researcher-developed questionnaire evaluating vulvar pleasure. Results Of the 192 patients (mean age: 39, SD: 14, range: 16-78) who completed all questionnaires and had current vulvar pain, 93.2% had experienced vulvar pleasure at some point in their lives and 76.6% had experienced some vulvar pleasure since their vulvar pain began. Patients who were able to experience vulvar pleasure since their vulvar pain began scored lowest on every subscale of both the PASS-20 and PCS and highest on the total FSFI, compared to patients who had never experienced vulvar pleasure and to patients who had not experienced vulvar pleasure since their vulvar pain began. There were significant differences in cognitive pain-related anxiety (p = 0.02), in the helplessness component of pain catastrophizing (p = 0.04), and in overall female sexual functioning (p < 0.00001) among the three groups. Conclusions The experience of vulvar pleasure in vulvar pain conditions is associated with lower PRA and PC, specifically in the domains of anxiety cognitions and helplessness, and higher SF overall. This was a novel study given its focus on vulvar pleasure in the context of patients with vulvar pain conditions. Clinicians should consider incorporating education and promotion of vulvar pleasure in vulvar pain treatment regimens. Disclosure Work supported by industry: no. A consultant, employee (part time or full time) or shareholder is among the authors (Dr. Goldstein is a consultant at Ipsen and a part-time employee at Daré Bioscience).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.383
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Sexual MedicineSame topicSexual function and dysfunction studiesFrench-language works237,207