Ergodic Capacity Analysis of NOMA-Based Two-Way Relaying Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>In this work, a non-orthogonal multiple access NOMA) relying on a two-way relaying (TWR) approach is investigated to promote more efficient use of the available spectrum. Specifically, a NOMA-enabled half-duplex decode-and-forward relay node is used to simultaneously exchange data between two cellular users and a base station (BS), while assuming that the direct links between the two users and the BS are unavailable or negligible. In our analysis, the ergodic capacity is evaluated, in which high signal-to-noise ratio approximations, as well as upper bounds are derived owing to the intractability related to the exact analysis. The results reveal the superiority of the proposed TWRNOMA scheme compared with the traditional one-way relaying (OWR-NOMA) scheme. Additionally, simulation results show that selecting a relay station (RS) closer to the BS can achieve a higher ergodic sum capacity or the system than selecting a far RS.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".