MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229370586 · doi:10.3389/fped.2022.887132

Case Report: A Very Low Birth Weight Female Infant With Congenital Bilateral Periventricular Leukomalacia, Born to a Mother With Coronavirus Disease 2019

2022· article· en· W4229370586 on OpenAlexaff
Keisuke Kobata, Nanae Yutaka, Hiroshi Ogasawara, Aya Mima, Kaho Suzuki, Ryoichi Hazama, Ran D. Goldman, Makoto Nabetani

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Pediatrics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePeriventricular leukomalaciaVentriculomegalyApgar scoreLateral ventriclesPediatricsGestational ageAbnormalityMagnetic resonance imagingBirth traumaPregnancyObstetricsFetusRadiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 26-year-old primipara woman with COVID-19 performed an emergency Cesarean section due to further hypoxemia at 28 weeks 5/7 days gestation. The female neonate was born weighing 1,347 gram with an Apgar score of four at 1 min, three at 5 min, and eight at 10 min. RT-PCR from nasopharyngeal swabs for COVID-19 were performed at birth, 24 h, and 48 h after birth, all of which were negative. On head ultrasound bilateral cystic lesions were found in the anterior horn of the lateral ventricles at birth. A brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) test at 56 days of life (corrected 36 weeks and 6/7 days) revealed cystic lesions with T1 low signal, T2 high signal, and T2 Flair high signal around the anterior horn of the lateral ventricle and We diagnose it as Grade 2 periventricular leukomalacia (PVL). She was discharged on day 64 of life, with no abnormality on exam. While the majority of neonates born to women with COVID-19 during pregnancy have favorable outcome, we report a case of a neonate with Grade 2 periventricular leukomalacia and this should prompt clinicians to monitor fetal cerebral function and structure shortly after birth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PediatricsSame topicCOVID-19 Impact on ReproductionFrench-language works237,207