MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229448083 · doi:10.18280/ts.390217

Roll Rate Estimation for Cylindrical Spinning Vehicle Based on Pseudorange Observations

2022· article· en· W4229448083 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Feng Lu, Peng Wu, Linhua Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPseudorangeGNSS applicationsSpinningMeasure (data warehouse)BasebandComputer scienceGlobal Positioning SystemStandard deviationRotation (mathematics)Real-time computingSimulationEngineeringTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceMathematicsStatisticsBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Roll rate estimation is essential to attitude measurement. During the processing of baseband signals, it is complicated to measure the vehicle rolling attitude, based on the energy features of existing satellite signals. To measure the energy of received signals in real time, the data communication interface and storage unit of the receiving device must be customized. However, the customization will push up the cost of attitude sensors, and result in processing delays. To solve the problem, this paper measures the vehicle roll rate by the variation features of pseudorange observations, which are easy to acquire and highly applicable. Specifically, the roll rate of a cylindrical spinning vehicle was estimated, using Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver with single side-mounted antenna. After analyzing the variation of pseudorange observations, the authors calculated the roll rate of the cylindrical spinning vehicle based on the variation rules. The proposed approach was verified through experiments with simulated GNSS signals. The accuracy of our approach was measured at different rotation speeds and translational speeds. The results show that our approach can accurately estimate the roll rate when the standard deviations of noise is less than 1m for pseudorange measurement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.350
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicInertial Sensor and NavigationFrench-language works237,207