Lenalidomide Improves Cognitive Function and Reduces Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome in HIV-1-Related Cryptococcal Meningitis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cryptococcal meningitis (CM) is a common opportunistic infection in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Although there is a standardized treatment for CM, some patients still have CM-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) after anti-cryptococcal and antiretroviral therapy, which manifests as cognitive impairment. We report two cases of CM-associated IRIS in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients that were treated with lenalidomide. The treatment yielded a rapid clinical remission and improved cognitive function in both patients; their Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and International HIV Dementia Scale (IHDS) scores improved. Furthermore, we evaluated changes in 32 cytokines in the cerebrospinal fluid of two patients and found that both MoCA and IHDS were significantly negatively correlated with inflammation-related factors (growth-related oncogene, interleukin [IL]-10, IL-2, IL-8, macrophage inflammatory protein-1β, tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α) and significantly positively correlated with dementia-related factors (αβ42 and total tau). Our study reveals the potential of lenalidomide in treating cognitive impairment caused by immune-mediated inflammation in patients with HIV-CM. Moreover, we speculate that lenalidomide improves cognitive function by regulating intracranial inflammation via multiple pathways, not only by TNF-α blocking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it