MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229455753 · doi:10.18280/ts.390208

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) Classification Based on Heart Rate Variability (HRV) on Electrocardiogram (ECG) Signal Using Support Vector Machine (SVM)

2022· article· en· W4229455753 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Achmad Rizal, Fauzan Dizki Alif Azmi Siregar, Hilman Tresna Fauzi

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversitas Telkom
KeywordsSupport vector machineHeart rate variabilityObstructive sleep apneaSleep apneaArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)ElectrocardiographyComputer scienceSIGNAL (programming language)Speech recognitionMedicineHeart rateCardiologyInternal medicineBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a disorder that occurs in a person's sleep pattern, and due to its ability to cause other health-related problems, various monitoring methods have been developed. One of the proposed methods is the ECG signal known as ECG-derived respiration (EDR), which uses changes in rhythm and patterns regularity to detect OSA occurrence. Therefore, this study aims to determine the OSA classification based on heart-rate variability (HRV) on electrocardiogram (ECG) signal using a support vector machine (SVM). The HRV parameter displays the rhythmic changes in the ECG signal under normal and OSA conditions. Eleven HRV characteristics were used to produce the highest accuracy of 89.5% with a support vector machine (SVM) as a classifier. The results were tested on a 1 minute long ECG signal annotated by an expert, which indicated that OSA can be detected by observing the dynamics of the distance of the R-R wave on the ECG signal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchFrench-language works237,207