MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229495789 · doi:10.1210/jcem.86.11.7995

Prostaglandin F2α Potentiates Cortisol Production by Stimulating 11β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase 1: A Novel Feedback Loop That May Contribute to Human Labor

2001· article· en· W4229495789 on OpenAlexaff
Nadia Alfaidy, Zhi‐Gang Xiong, Leslie Myatt, Stephen. J. Lye, John F. MacDonald, John Challis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMount Sinai HospitalCoalition for Research in Women's HealthUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCortisoneInternal medicineEndocrinology11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1DehydrogenaseReceptorIntracellularBETA (programming language)ChemistryEnzymeBiologyMedicineCell biologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In human pregnancy, cortisol and PGs are involved in the onset of labor and play an important role in the mechanisms leading to parturition. Recent studies have shown that at term, cortisol increases PG synthesis and decreases PG metabolism in chorion trophoblast (CT) cells. In CT, 11 β-hydroxysteroid oxidase type 1 (11β -HSD1) converts biologically inactive cortisone to cortisol to regulate cortisol availability. In the present study, we have investigated whether 11 β-HSD1 activity could be influenced by PGs. We have shown that in CT, PGF2α rapidly increased 11β -HSD1 reductase activity in a dose-dependent manner via the PGF2α receptor, localized in the fetal membranes. PGF2α stimulated 11 β-HSD1 activity through increased intracellular calcium mobilization, activation of PKC, and the phosphorylation of the 11 β-HSD enzyme. We propose that within CT there is a novel feed forward loop by which PGF2α acts to promote cortisol production from cortisone through increases in 11β-HSD1, and this in turn leads to further net PG output for the onset of labor and birth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score0.708

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & MetabolismSame topicHormonal Regulation and HypertensionFrench-language works237,207