CAN volume 41 issue 3 Cover and Back matter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Or A u t h o r st ' o n m Canada of international philosophical work of high quality, in English or French, in any field of philosophy.All submissions are given blind editorial review.As many submissions as possible are sent to external referees, with a response to authors within six months of submission.When submissions are not sent for external refereeing, CJP endeavours to respond to authors within three months.Submissions may be sent to the Executive Secretary at cjp@uleth.ca in either Word or WordPerfect.Where submissions contain symbols or Greek letters, PDF files are preferable.Manuscripts should be double-spaced, including quotes and footnotes, in a standard (e.g., 12 point) font.CJP will not normally consider manuscripts longer than 10,000 words.Footnotes should be numbered consecutively and placed at the bottom of each page. The Journal follows The University of Chicago Manual of Style, Manuscripts should be prepared for blind review, which means they should contain no self-identifying references in either text or footnotes.An abstract of 150 to 250 words should also be included.Authors will receive, without charge, 25 copies of their articles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.774 | 0.628 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".