MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Radiation Assessment: Use of Transfer Parameters

2012· reference-entry· en· W4229540537 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSpringerReference · 2012
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Materials ResearchUniversity of Toronto ScarboroughLos Alamos National LaboratorySmithsonian Conservation Biology InstituteUniversity of GeorgiaUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUniversität StuttgartUniversitat de LleidaUniversity of PennsylvaniaInternational Institute for Carbon-Neutral Energy Research, Kyushu UniversityUniversität Duisburg-EssenInstitut National de la Recherche AgronomiqueUniversity of HaifaImperial College LondonUniversity of TorontoCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationOrta Doğu Teknik ÜniversitesiRijksuniversiteit GroningenUniversity of EdinburghUniversity of East AngliaDirectorate for Biological SciencesLandbúnaðarháskóli ÍslandsUniversity of ExeterU.S. Geological SurveyInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis AvançatsGeorge Mason UniversityYork UniversityLeibniz-GemeinschaftTel Aviv UniversityNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and TechnologyNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationUniversity of Technology SydneyBundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -PrüfungKungliga Tekniska HögskolanClemson UniversityU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyUniversity of OxfordUniversity of VirginiaCarnegie Mellon UniversityNorth Carolina State UniversityUniversity of BernTongji UniversitySmithsonian InstitutionU.S. Department of EnergyVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityFP7 International CooperationHáskóli ÍslandsCity University of New YorkLunds UniversitetNorth Dakota State University
KeywordsRadiationEnvironmental sciencePhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueSpringerReferenceSame topicGraphite, nuclear technology, radiation studiesFrench-language works237,207