MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229545357 · doi:10.4133/sageep.27-106

GEOPHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF GROUNDWATER FLOW AND SALT TRANSPORT IN AN OIL-SAND TAILINGS POND DAM, ALBERTA, CANADA

2014· article· en· W4229545357 on OpenAlexaffabout
Aaron Booterbaugh, L. R. Bentley, C. A. Mendoza

Bibliographic record

VenueSymposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2014 · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTailingsOil sandsLand reclamationElectrical resistivity tomographyGeologyTailings damHydrogeologyGroundwaterHydraulic conductivityGroundwater flowHydrology (agriculture)Mining engineeringAsphaltEnvironmental scienceGeotechnical engineeringAquiferSoil waterSoil scienceArchaeologyElectrical resistivity and conductivityEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Geophysical studies were conducted as part of a hydrogeological study on the dam of an active tailings pond at an oil-sand mine site situated in northeast Alberta, Canada. The dam was largely constructed between 1993 and 2002, and is among the largest dams in the world by construction material volume. The tailings pond occupies 25 square kilometers and the tailings dam is up to 40 m high and 1 km wide. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) is added to recycled water during the bitumen extraction process, which results in sodium rich tailings composed primarily of coarse-grained sediments and water, with some fine-grained sediments and residual bitumen. The process affected coarse tailings are subsequently used as the dam construction material. The flow and transport of fresh and brackish fluids within the dam needs to be understood to properly manage the site, to understand flushing mechanisms and rates for tailings sand, and to design future site reclamation strategies. A series of direct push electrical conductivity, electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and EM38 surveys were conducted between 2001 and 2008. In addition, hydraulic head, temperature, aqueous electrical conductivity, water chemistry and soil-moisture content were monitored along detailed transects from 2002. Geophysical methods clearly image zones of groundwater discharge and flushed portions of the dam. The geophysical results are consistent with the hydrogeologic investigations and provide a more comprehensive picture of the subsurface conditions. The data will be used to help calibrate and validate groundwater flow and transport models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.154
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSymposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2014Same topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207