Sémiologie de la Typographie Gérard Blanchard, Les éditions Riguil Internationales, Québec, 1982, 191 pages.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Writer and historian of typography, Jérôme Peignot was born in 1926 in an environment of “letters of lead” making him an heir of Balzac (as a printer) who liked to present himself as a “man of letters of lead”. Son of Charles Peignot who managed the famous font maker Deberny-Peignot, Jérôme Peignot has witnessed the changes in the printing industry from the disappearance of lead and helio to the use of light. For the last twenty years he has advocated for the jeopardised Imprimerie nationale to be safeguarded while the governments passed and no long term satisfactory answer was given to protect and develop this jewel of the world heritage of arts and letters. We paid him a visit in the Yonne with André Belleguie in the summer of 2013. He trusted us with a handwritten testimony which is published as a tribute to Gérard Blanchard.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.050 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".