MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229591939 · doi:10.5951/mt.103.2.0104

Mathematical Lens: Planes, Ferries, and Cylinders: Some Conic Sections

2009· article· en· W4229591939 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics Teacher Learning and Teaching PK-12 · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitecture and Art History Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConic sectionPlanetariumSection (typography)Lens (geology)Conical surfacePlane (geometry)Column (typography)ArtArt historyVisual artsGeometryMathematicsOpticsComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When the “Mathematical Lens” editors walked a mathematics trail in and around the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art several years ago, we marveled at the architecture—in particular, a central, open cylindrical column truncated at an angle (see photographs 1 and 2 )—and considered the mathematics of the cross section. Since then, we received a photograph of the Shafran Planetarium at the Cleveland (Ohio) Museum of Natural History, taken by Julian D'Angela, a mathematics teacher in Hamilton, Ontario (see photograph 3 ), that shows a conical structure cut by a plane. Editor Bentele took more photographs of San Francisco structures truncated at varying angles and considered further the mathematics involved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematics Teacher Learning and Teaching PK-12Same topicArchitecture and Art History StudiesFrench-language works237,207