MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4229594701 · doi:10.1139/w01-058

Extrusion of actin-positive strands from HEp-2 and Int 407 cells caused by outer membrane preparations of enteropathogenic<i>Escherichia coli</i>and specific attachment of wild type bacteria to the strands

2001· article· en· W4229594701 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sukumaran Sunil Kumar, Vasantha Malladi, Krishnan Sankaran, Richard Haigh, P. H. Williams, Arun Balakrishnan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEscherichia coli research studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTata TrustsLady Tata Memorial Trust
KeywordsEnteropathogenic Escherichia coliBacterial outer membraneEscherichia coliActinMicrobiologyBiologyProtein filamentCytoskeletonCell membraneMembraneCell biologyCellBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) causes persistent infantile diarrhoea. This nontoxigenic E. coli exhibits a complicated pathogenic mechanism in which its outer membrane proteins and type III secretory proteins damage intestinal epithelium and cause diarrhoea. In accordance with this, our previous study using HEp-2 cells demonstrated cytopathic effects caused by cell-free outer membrane preparations of EPEC. In this study, we report the extrusion of actin-positive strands from HEp-2 and Int 407 cells when treated with outer membrane preparations. An interesting observation of this work, perhaps relevant to the characteristic localized three-dimensional colony formation of EPEC, is the attachment of a wild type EPEC strain to these actin-positive strands.Key words: enteropathogenic Escherichia coli, actin, outer membrane proteins, cytoskeletal elements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Microbiology→Same topicEscherichia coli research studies→French-language works237,207→