Posture invariant gender classification for 3D human models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study the behaviorally important task of gender classification based on the human body shape. We propose a new technique to classify by gender human bodies represented by possibly incomplete triangular meshes obtained using laser range scanners. The classification algorithm is invariant of the posture of the human body. Geodesic distances on the mesh are used for classification. Our results indicate that the geodesic distances between the chest and the wrists and the geodesic distances between the lower back and the face are the most important ones for gender classification. The classification is shown to perform well for different postures of the human subjects. We model the geodesic distance distributions as Gaussian distributions and compute the quality of the classification for three standard methods in pattern recognition: linear discriminant functions, Bayesian discriminant functions, and support vector machines. All of the experiments yield high classification accuracy. For instance, when support vector machines are used, the classification accuracy is at least 93% for all of our experiments. This shows that geodesic distances are suitable to discriminate humans by gender.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it