Bibliographic record
Abstract
of hospital pharmacy practice.Mits Miyata has been selected as the inaugural CSHP Executive mentee, and he actively participated in the Executive and Council meetings that took place during the 2012 SES.Finances: Another new task force has been struck to evaluate the potential impact of the "changing landscape" of Canadian health care on the success of the SES, a key member benefit and source of revenue for the Society.The ongoing success and growth of this event are pivotal to the future strength of CSHP.In formulating its recommendations, this task force will be considering a variety of factors, such as mergers in the pharmaceutical industry, industry models of financial support, alternative modes of delivering education, hospital funding for staff attendance at educational events, and the needs of the membership.I feel confident in asserting that CSHP is a strong organization, and I hope you will agree with this assessment.Maintaining and increasing the strength of the Society in these times of change is a key area of focus for me, in the Internal Liaison portfolio.I look forward to the outcomes and recommendations of the task forces in the upcoming months.CSHP is as strong as it has been in the past, and we can expect it to continue with strength into the future . . .even as "the times they are a-changin'"!Janice Munroe, BScPharm, is Past President and Internal Liaison for the Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".