Politique de la consommation : Questions nationales dans les récents écrits sur l’histoire de la consommation. BAUER, Arnold J., Goods, Power, History : Latin America’s Material Culture (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001), xx-245 p. COHEN, Lizabeth, A Consumers’ Republic : The Politics of Mass Consumption in Postwar America (New York, Knopf, Distributed by Random House, 2003), 480 p. GRONOW, Jukka, Caviar with Champagne : Common Luxury and the Ideals of the Good Life in Stalin’s Russia (Oxford/New York, Berg, 2003), xii-196 p. HILTON, Matthew, Consumerism in 20 Century Britain : The Search for a Historical Movement (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003), 396 p. KORINEK, Valerie J., Roughing it in the Suburbs : Reading Chatelaine Magazine in the Fifties and Sixties (Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2000), 512 p. TIERSTEN, Lisa, Marianne in the Market : Envisioning Consumer Society in Fin-de-Siècle France (Berkeley, University of California Press, 2001), xiii-321 p.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Politique de la consommation : questions nationales dans les récents écrits sur l’histoire de la consommation / BAUER, Arnold J., Goods, Power, History : Latin America’s Material Culture (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001), xx-245 p. / COHEN, Lizabeth, A Consumers’ Republic : The Politics of Mass Consumption in Postwar America (New York, Knopf, Distributed by Random House, 2003), 480 p. / GRONOW, Jukka, Caviar with Champagne : Common Luxury and the Ideals of the Good Life in Stalin’s Russia (Oxford/New York, Berg, 2003), xii-196 p. / HILTON, Matthew, Consumerism in 20th Century Britain : The Search for a Historical Movement (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003), 396 p. / KORINEK, Valerie J., Roughing it in the Suburbs : Reading Chatelaine Magazine in the Fifties and Sixties (Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2000), 512 p. / TIERSTEN, Lisa, Marianne in the Market : Envisioning Consumer Society in Fin-de-Siècle France (Berkeley, University of California Press, 2001), xiii-321 p.. An article from journal Revue d'histoire de l'Amérique française (La consommation), on Érudit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.035 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.021 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".