MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229633622 · doi:10.1177/0027950111401137

Prospects for the UK Economy

2011· article· en· W4229633622 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Simon Kirby, Ray Barrell, Rachel Whitworth

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Institute Economic Review · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGerman Economic Analysis & Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRestructuringConsolidation (business)SlowdownEconomicsQuarter (Canadian coin)RetimingEconomyEconomic policyEconomic growthGeographyFinanceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The performance of the UK economy was surprisingly weak in the final three months of 2010. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) preliminary estimate of GDP suggests the economy contracted by 0.5 per cent in the quarter. Much of this can be attributed to the exceptionally bad weather in the weeks before the Christmas holidays. But even when this effect is excluded UK economic growth is estimated to have stalled. It is important to gauge the signal in this slowdown, because if it is continued it will affect Bank of England decision making and strengthen the case for restructuring and retiming the fiscal consolidation that is underway. The composition of growth is important in this re-evaluation of prospects. While one would expect the construction sector to be hampered by adverse weather, the contraction in services output was more surprising.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.146

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNational Institute Economic ReviewSame topicGerman Economic Analysis & PoliciesFrench-language works237,207