MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229643944 · doi:10.7748/nop.17.10.33.s15

Advising patients with medication related dysphagia: caution required

2006· article· en· W4229643944 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing Older People · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDysphagia Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDysphagiaMedicineSwallowingCompliance (psychology)Quarter (Canadian coin)Product (mathematics)Medical emergencyFamily medicinePsychologySurgerySocial psychologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Around a quarter of all patients in a typical GP practice have difficulty in swallowing tablets. This is one of the most common problems affecting compliance. Most commonly prescribed medications are now available in liquid form and many more can be obtained as unlicensed special formulations. These medicines, known as 'specials', are formulated in accordance with the requirements of the doctor and must be for the use of an individual patient on the prescriber's direct personal responsibility. Specials cannot be advertised and cannot be supplied if an equivalent licensed product is available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.051
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.051
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0160.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNursing Older PeopleSame topicDysphagia Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207