Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
First Nations designs and motifs derived from crest imagery have proliferated over the last two decades in urban British Columbia. Their circulation through public and private spaces is, however, subject to limitations, variously perceptible. The notion of figuration is used to consider the ways in which this material is apprehended. Non-natives through whose hands this material circulates, typically exercising what they think of as their rights to freedom of access, are led towards more intractable forms of ‘evidence’ for aboriginality. First Nations, equally implicated in its circulation, exercising their sovereign rights, monitor the ‘trivia’ in such a way that it becomes, not without an ironic readjustment of power relations, a line of defence against further encroachment. In this sense the most ephemeral, apparently valueless, items are characterized by keeping-while-giving and are declarations of the inalienable. It is suggested that inalienability derives from the idea of mutual embodiment as between humans and non-humans figured in the crests.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it