MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229781797 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/nov237.13

TMOD-13GENETICALLY ENGINEERED MOUSE MODELS OF CHOROID PLEXUS TUMORS

2015· article· en· W4229781797 on OpenAlexaff
Jun Wang, Diana M. Merino, Brian R. Murphy, Girish Dhall, Erin N. Kiehna, Alexander R. Judkins, Charles G. Eberhart, Scott R. VandenBerg, David H. Ellison, David Malkin, Richard J. Gilbertson, Martine F. Roussel, Robert J. Wechsler‐Reya

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Biology Tumor Growth
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChoroid plexusAnatomyPathologyBiologyMedicineNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Choroid plexus tumors are the most common brain tumors in children under one year of age, accounting for up to 20% of brain tumors in that age group. These tumors exhibit a range of malignancies, from relatively benign choroid plexus papillomas (CPPs) to extremely aggressive choroid plexus carcinomas (CPCs), which despite intensive therapy, have a dismal prognosis. More effective treatments for these tumors depend on animal models that can be used to study tumor biology. We have created animal models of choroid plexus tumors by crossing mice carrying Cre-inducible alleles of Myc (LSL-MycT58A) and Cre-deletable alleles of p53 (p53flox) to animals that express Cre recombinase in cerebellar neural progenitor cells (Atoh1-Cre). The progeny of these crosses develop choroid plexus tumors with high penetrance: activation of Myc alone results in CPPs, and concomitant deletion of p53 accelerates tumor growth and malignancy, culminating in formation of CPCs. Histological and gene expression analyses indicate that our mouse CPPs and CPCs share common features with their human counterparts, such as large chromosomal imbalances, altered expression of cell cycle regulators. To utilize these mouse models for preclinical studies, we performed a high throughput screening with more than 7800 biologically active compounds. We have identified several compounds that effectively inhibit mouse and human choroid plexus tumor growth with minimal toxicity to postmitotic neurons. These studies provide important insight into the mechanisms of choroid plexus tumorigenesis, and yield valuable animal models that can be used to identify novel therapies for patients with aggressive choroid plexus tumors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicMathematical Biology Tumor GrowthFrench-language works237,207