MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229793537 · doi:10.1353/is.2006.0004

Abba Eban, The Toynbee Heresy

2006· article· en· W4229793537 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Natan Aridan

Bibliographic record

VenueIsrael Studies · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCivilizationJudaismContext (archaeology)HeresyNazismHistoryCaliphateReligious studiesAncient historyPhilosophyClassicsTheologyGermanArchaeologyIslam

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

British historian Arnold J. Toynbee in his twelve volume A Study of History, (1934–1961), on the rise and decline of twenty-three civilizations, depicted the Jews as a "fossil" civilization. Toynbee presented history as the rise and fall of civilizations, rather than the history of nation-states or of ethnic groups. He identified his civilizations according to cultural rather than national criteria. With the civilizations as units identified, he presented the history of each in terms of challenge-and-response. Civilizations arose in response to some set of challenges of extreme difficulty, when "creative minorities" devised solutions that reoriented their entire society. When a civilization responds to challenges, it grows. When it fails to respond to a challenge, it enters its period of decline. Toynbee argued that "Civilizations die from suicide, not by murder." Although Toynbee's defenders deny he was anti-Semitic, Elie Kedourie pointed out that Toynbee did not hesitate to describe the Jews as a "fossil" civilization or, in 1948, to equate the Palestinian Jews, battling to establish the state of Israel, with the Nazis. When he finally got around to reconsidering his position on Judaism, it was in the context of celebrating the idea of world government and insisting that the Jews lead the way in demonstrating to mankind the folly of capitalism, nationalism, and territorial attachment. Yaacov Herzog Israel's ambassador to Canada challenged Toynbee to a debate which took place in January 1961 at McGill University, Montreal in which he convincingly refuted Toynbee's thesis. Little credit for Herzog's success was attributed to Abba Eban, Israel's ambassador to the United States, who had provided the main thrust of Herzog's argument in an address on The Toynbee Heresy delivered six years earlier. During the debate Herzog noted that Toynbee's ideas had 'been challenged by historians of great eminence and writers', and cited the 'Toynbee Heresy'. However, it was Toynbee himself who had to remind [End Page 91] Herzog that this term was formulated and elucidated upon by Abba Eban. Furthermore, there is no recognition of Eban's contribution either in Herzog's book A People That Dwells Alone (London, 1976) or in Michael Bar-Zohar's, Yaacov Herzog—A Biography (London, 2005). Abba Eban read Classics and Oriental languages at Cambridge where he achieved the extraordinary distinction of a "Triple First" and a clutch of prizes and scholarships. Eban concentrated on Arabic literature and history. He recalled, "I came to be impressed by its large visions and exuberant resources . . . the Islamic Arabic poetry and the histories, geographies, and literary and philosophical treatises of the caliphate periods were intellectually and emotionally stirring . . . My deep immersion in that legacy made it impossible for me thereafter to adopt the routine Zionist stereotype that regarded the Arab nation with intellectual condescension." Through his studies of the Arab world, and contacts with Arab students Eban came face to face with the roots of the conflict between "two nationalisms striving for fulfilment in the same country." After completing his degree, he went on to become a Research Fellow in Oriental Studies (Arabic and Hebrew). He also worked part time for the Zionist movement. He found his own research and teaching in oriental studies to be "intolerably irrelevant in terms of my own urgent instinct for public service." In December, 1939, Eban left the closet academia at Cambridge and went to work for Chaim Weizmann at the Zionist Headquarters in London.[End Page 92] The Toynbee Heresy Abba Eban Ambassador of Israel to the United States Address Delivered at the Israel Institute, Yeshiva University New York, 18th January 1955* . . . . . . a generally affirmative approach to the history of the Jewish people can be discerned in all but the most eccentric historical writing until Toynbee. Indeed, the attempts to discredit the Jewish historic process have, until this year, been confined to those who have sought an academic rationalisation for religious or political hostility. Significance of Toynbee's Revolt We cannot...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.158

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIsrael StudiesSame topicJewish and Middle Eastern StudiesFrench-language works237,207