MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229795660 · doi:10.1109/ias.1989.96721

PWM-CSI induction motor drives with phase angle control

2003· article· en· W4229795660 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueConference Record of the IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulse-width modulationStatorInduction motorVector controlControl theory (sociology)InverterTorqueDirect torque controlComputer scienceVoltageAC motorMachine controlCurrent (fluid)HarmonicControl engineeringEngineeringControl (management)Electrical engineeringPhysicsArtificial intelligenceAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A pulse-width-modulated current source inverter (PWM-CSI) drive system using an induction motor is described. Its dominant feature is that it provides adequate control of either torque or speed over a wide range without requiring a shaft position or speed sensor. The drive is simple to implement, rugged and sufficient for many controlled drive applications. The control strategy is based on the concept of controlling the stator phase angle of the induction motor. The stator voltage is sensed and the current source inverter is used to inject current into the motor with the desired phase angle. The system incorporates modulation techniques for harmonic control described in a comparison paper (see Conf. Record 1989 IEEE IAS Annual Meeting, pt.I, p.508-513, 1989).< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.184
Threshold uncertainty score0.842

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it