MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229799740 · doi:10.1002/int.20018

Belief, plausibility, and probability measures on interval-valued type 2 fuzzy sets

2004· article· en· W4229799740 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicMulti-Criteria Decision Making
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsInterval (graph theory)AxiomType (biology)Measure (data warehouse)Fuzzy setFuzzy logicDiscrete mathematicsProbability measureSet (abstract data type)Fuzzy measure theoryRepresentation (politics)AnalogyFuzzy numberCombinatoricsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Belief (Bel), plausibility (Pl), and probability (P) measures can be formulated on interval-valued type 2 fuzzy sets with their representation in terms of α-level (crisp) sets. Recently, it was shown that interval-valued type 2 fuzzy sets naturally arise with modified and restricted multivalued maps of Dempster. An analogy to Dempster's upper and lower probabilities, upper and lower beliefs, and Pl and P measures can be determined over interval-valued type 2 fuzzy sets. It is shown that the application of appropriate t-norms over α-values of α-level crisp sets in combination with the axiom of Bel measure entails appropriate weights for the overlapping α-level (crisp) set conjunctions where Bel measure is applicable. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.591
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.253
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it