MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229812038 · doi:10.1017/9781108596800.012

B010 <i>v</i>. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

2020· article· en· W4229812038 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Law Reports · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Aviation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeeImmigrationCitizenshipLawPolitical scienceConventionSection (typography)Immigration lawOrder (exchange)BusinessPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — United Nations Convention Relating to Status of Refugees, 1951 — 1967 Protocol — Canada signatory — Canada’s obligations under treaties — Parliamentary intention — Canadian Immigration and Refugee Protection Act — Section 37(1)(b) — Interpretation — Inadmissibility to Canada on ground of “people smuggling” — Whether “people smuggling” limited to activity done in order to obtain, directly or indirectly, a financial or other material benefit — Definition in Section 117 — Reliance of Immigration Board on definition in Section 117 — Admissibility to Canada Aliens — Migrants to Canada — Appellant seeking refugee status — Prohibited range of conduct making person inadmissible to apply for refugee status — Section 37(1)(b) of Immigration and Refugee Protection Act — “People smuggling” — Whether limited to activity done in order to obtain, directly or indirectly, a financial or other material benefit — Definition in Section 117 — Reliance of Immigration Board on definition in Section 117 — Admissibility to Canada — The law of Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.240
Threshold uncertainty score0.801

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2400.070

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Law ReportsSame topicInternational Law and AviationFrench-language works237,207