MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Review Lindsay McMaster<b><i>Working Girls in the West: Representations of Wage-Earning Women</i></b>. (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2008. x + 209 pp. Notes, bibliography, index. $85.00 cloth; $32.00, paper.)

2010· article· en· W4229824387 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern Historical Quarterly · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Gender and Feminism Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of the Fraser Valley
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndex (typography)BibliographyWageHistorySociologyLibrary sciencePolitical scienceLawComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Working Girls in the West: Representations of Wage-Earning Women Get access Working Girls in the West: Representations of Wage-Earning Women. By McMaster Lindsay. (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2008. x + 209 pp. Notes, bibliography, index. $85.00 cloth; $32.00, paper.) Jenéa Tallentire Jenéa Tallentire University of the Fraser Valley Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Western Historical Quarterly, Volume 41, Issue 1, Spring 2010, Page 88, https://doi.org/10.2307/westhistquar.41.1.0088 Published: 01 February 2010

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestern Historical QuarterlySame topicHistorical Gender and Feminism StudiesFrench-language works237,207