MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229834646 · doi:10.1680/jgeot.16.p.304

Mechanical properties of a carbonate sand from a dredged hydraulic fill

2017· article· en· W4229834646 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGéotechnique · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsGolder Associates (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbonateGeotechnical engineeringGeologySubmarine pipelineOffshore geotechnical engineeringCarbonate rockMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on the properties of a crushable, uncemented, carbonate sand, retrieved from an artificial island to be used for petroleum production offshore of the United Arab Emirates. The sand was dredged from an offshore borrow area, placed hydraulically within engineered bunds to create the island and densified by vibroflotation. The results of a comprehensive laboratory testing programme are summarised in this paper, providing a set of mechanical properties for carbonate sand. The laboratory programme included static, cyclic and dynamic tests, the results of which are interpreted in a critical state soil mechanics framework, including stress dilatancy. The results of this testing programme contribute to on-going research on the behaviour of carbonate sands under static and cyclic loading conditions. The results are also compared with selected data for other carbonate and siliceous sands, and highlight the behaviour of crushable, carbonate sands used as hydraulic fills.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.751

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it