MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229837463 · doi:10.1109/61.997885

Failure mechanisms of shielded power cable related to high ground shield resistance and/or insulation of neutral wires from the ground shield

2002· article· en· W4229837463 on OpenAlexaff
S.A. Boggs

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShieldShielded cableGroundElectromagnetic shieldingArc flashConductorContext (archaeology)Power cableLightning (connector)Electrical conductorElectrical engineeringEngineeringStructural engineeringGeotechnical engineeringPower (physics)Materials scienceVoltageGeologyComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A number of conditions can cause separation of the neutral wires from the semiconducting ground shield or cause a large increase in the resistivity of the ground shield. Such conditions can lead to (i) the ground shield becoming effectively floating or (ii) the ground shield acting as a dielectric rather than conductor. In either case, this can lead to partial discharge under normal operating voltage and/or lightning surge-induced flashover between the neutral wires and ground shield, conditions which can cause cable failure. The theoretical context of these conditions is examined, after which a concrete example which has resulted in field failures is provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicLightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207