MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mitigation of Subsynchronous Interactions in Hybrid AC/DC Grid with Renewable Energy using Faster-Than-Real-Time Dynamic Simulation

2021· article· en· W4229854372 on OpenAlexaff
Shiqi Cao, Ning Lin, Venkata Dinavahi

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceGridConvertersElectric power systemMATLABDynamic simulationPower (physics)Transient (computer programming)VoltageSimulationEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transmission line capacity enhancement by series compensation is commonly used in power systems, which consequently faces potential subsynchronous interaction (SSI). In this work, faster-than-real-time (FTRT) simulation based on the field-programmable gate arrays is proposed to mitigate the disastrous SSI in a hybrid AC/DC grid integrated with wind farms. Dynamic simulation is applied to the AC system to gain a high speedup over real-time, and a detailed multi-mass model is specifically introduced to the synchronous generator to show the electrical-mechanical interaction. Meanwhile, the DC grid undergoes electromagnetic transient simulation to reflect the impact of power converters' control on the overall grid, and consequently, the EMT-dynamic co-simulation running concurrently due to FPGA's hardware parallelism is formed. As the two simulations are inherently distinct, a power-voltage interface is adopted to separate them which enables their coexistence in one program. It shows that following the detection of a contingency, the FTRT hardware platform can generate an optimum solution with precisely quantified power flow changes in advance to keep the hybrid AC/DC grid stable. The FTRT efficacy is proven by a number of cases where the accuracy is validated by offline simulation tool Matlab/Simulink.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.278
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2021 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM)Same topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207