Characterization of the interaction of recombinant apolipoprotein(a) with modified fibrinogen surfaces and fibrin clots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in plasma are a significant risk factor for the development of atherosclerotic disease, a property which may arise from the ability of this lipoprotein to inhibit fibrinolysis. In the present study we have quantitated the binding of recombinant forms of apolipoprotein(a) [17K and 12K r-apo(a); containing 8 and 3 copies, respectively, of the major repeat kringle sequence (kringle IV type 2)] to modified fibrinogen surfaces. Iodinated 17K and 12K r-apo(a) bound to immobilized thrombin-modified fibrinogen (i.e., fibrin) surfaces with similar affinities (K d ~ 1.2 - 1.6 µM). The total concentration of binding sites (B max ) present on the fibrin surface was ~4-fold greater for the 12K than for the 17K (B max values of 0.81 ± 0.09 nM, and 0.20 ± 0.01 nM respectively), suggesting that the total binding capacity on fibrin surfaces is reduced for larger apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) species. Interestingly, binding of apo(a) to intact fibrin was not detected as assessed by measurement of intrinsic fluorescence of free apo(a) present in the supernatants of sedimented fibrin clots. In other experiments, the total concentration apo(a) binding sites available on plasmin-modified fibrinogen surfaces was shown to be 13.5-fold higher than the number of sites available on unmodified fibrin surfaces (B max values of 2.7 ± 0.3 nM and 0.20 ± 0.01 nM respectively) while the affinity of apo(a) for these surfaces was similar. The increase in B max was correlated with plasmin-mediated exposure of C-terminal lysines since treatment of plasmin-modified fibrinogen surfaces with carboxypeptidase B produced a significant decrease in total binding signal as detected by ELISA (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay). Taken together, these data suggest that apo(a) binds to fibrin with poor affinity (low µM) and that the total concentration of apo(a) binding sites available on modified-fibrinogen surfaces is affected by both apo(a) isoform size and by the increased availability of C-terminal lysines on plasmin-degraded fibrinogen surfaces. However, the low affinity of apo(a) for fibrin indicates that Lp(a) may inhibit fibrinolysis through a mechanism distinct from binding to fibrin, such as binding to plasminogen.Key words: fibrinolysis, lipoprotein(a), plasminogen activation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".