Géographie, musique et postcolonialisme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vous avez dit postcolonialisme ? Six articles de la revue Volume ! abordent depuis des focales diverses une perspective critique sur les notions de « proche » et de « lointain », depuis le terrain mondialisé des musiques populaires. Deux tribunes prolongent ce dossier : une lettre ouverte sur les « musiques noires » (premier texte publié en français du musicologue Philip Tagg), et un entretien avec Alexandre Laumonnier de Kargo, la maison d’édition au long cours. Enfin, cinq articles hors dossier (sur le punk au Québec, le metal, Albert Ayler et le free jazz en France, Noir Désir et Nurse With Wound) viennent compléter le numéro. Six articles of this issue apply the concept of postcolonialism to the analysis of popular music in its geographical and historical dimensions, and its relationship to questions of race and potscolonial influence. They are followed by a new French translation of Philip Tagg's open letter on "black" music and five articles on punk in Quebec, metal, Albert Ayler and free jazz in France, the French rock band Noir Désir and Nurse With Wound.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".