MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229896219 · doi:10.3233/fi-2011-582

Preface

2011· article· la· W4229896219 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Henning Bordihn, Rudolf Freund, Mika Hirvensalo, Markus Holzer, Martin Kutrib, Friedrich Otto

Bibliographic record

VenueFundamenta Informaticae · 2011
Typearticle
Languagela
FieldComputer Science
Topicsemigroups and automata theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMagyar Tudományos AkadémiaQueen's UniversityUniversität WienTechnische Universität WienLoughborough UniversityFriedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
KeywordsAutomatonComputer scienceCellular automatonTheoretical computer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many non-classical automata models are natural objects of theoretical computer science.They are studied from different points of view in various areas, both as theoretical concepts and as formal models for applications.A deeper and interdisciplinary coverage of this particular area may lead to new insights and substantial progress.The Second Workshop on Non-Classical Models of Automata and Applications (NCMA 2010) has been organized in order to bring together researchers working on different aspects of various variants of non-classical automata models to exchange and develop novel ideas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.789
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFundamenta InformaticaeSame topicsemigroups and automata theoryFrench-language works237,207