MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229908505 · doi:10.4324/9781315676777-18

Canada: The Intersection of International Achievement Testing and Educational Policy Development

2016· book-chapter· en· W4229908505 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Don A. Klinger

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Systems and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntersection (aeronautics)Mathematics educationPolitical sciencePsychologyGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada is the world’s second largest country geographically with a population of just over 35 million people. Canada’s population ranks close to 40th, having less than a half of a percentage point of the world’s population. The country consists of 10 provinces and three territories. Offi cially, Canada is a bilingual country (French and English), although these languages are not equally distributed across the country. New Brunswick is the only offi cial bilingual province, Quebec is considered a Francophone province, and the other provinces are considered to be Anglophone. According to Statistics Canada (2013), there are just over fi ve million students enrolled in Canada’s 15,500 publicly funded schools. There is a small private school system in Canada that services about 8% of eligible students across the country (Ontario Federation of Independent Schools, 2012). Statistics further suggest that the overall population of children in Canada’s schools is slowly but steadily declining.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.011
Science and technology studies0.0090.008
Scholarly communication0.0120.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEducation Systems and PolicyFrench-language works237,207