MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4229919041 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-25409/v1

Person-Centred Maternity Care in a Poor-Resource Setting: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study in Enugu State, Nigeria

2020· preprint· en· W4229919041 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Chukwuemeka Ogbuabor, Chikezie Nwankwor

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCross-sectional studyMaternity careState (computer science)Resource (disambiguation)NursingMedicineEnvironmental healthEconomic growthHealth careComputer scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Women are not getting adequate person-centred maternity care (PCMC) in low-income and middle-income countries despite being important in reducing maternal morbidity and mortality. This study assessed perceptions and predictors of PCMC among childbearing women in Enugu State, South-east Nigeria.Methods The study was conducted in two health districts in Enugu State using a descriptive, cross-sectional survey design. We conveniently selected 450 childbearing women, within 9 weeks post-partum, from 11 health facilities purposively selected based on high maternal and child health attendance. Data was collected from women using an interviewer administered 30-item PCMC scale (scores 0–90) consisting of: dignity and respect (6 items, scores 0–18), communication and autonomy (9 items, scores 0–27), and supportive care (15 items, scores 0–45). We categorized full PCMC and each sub-scale into “low, medium and high” using 25th and 75th percentile of the summative scores. The questionnaire also collected data on women characteristics, facility characteristics and service type. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, t- tests, analysis of variance and Generalized Linear Models.Results Women had medium scores on full PCMC scale and sub-scales. The lowest score was in communication and autonomy. A quarter of women perceived PCMC as high. Marrying at age 20–29 years (β = 5.83, ρ = 0.002), self-employed women (β = -10.23, ρ = 0.004), starting antenatal care in the third trimester (β = -7.93, ρ = 0.008), high participation in household decisions (β = -4.98, ρ = 0.011), domestic violence experience (β = 5.41, ρ = 0.002), delivery at health centre (β = 7.09, ρ = 0.000), delivery at private/mission hospital (β = 17.47, ρ = 0.000), delivery by non-skilled attendant (β = -9.61, ρ = 0.001); delivery by community health workers (β = -7.65, ρ = 0.001), and experience of pregnancy complication (β = 6.20, ρ = 0.028) predicted PCMC.Conclusions Person-centred maternity care was generally inadequate. Improving PCMC would entail sustaining dignified care, enhancing provider-patient communication, addressing facility-level drivers, increasing women’s personal empowerment and self-employment, timely initiation of antenatal care, and paying attention to women with pregnancy complication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGlobal Maternal and Child Health→French-language works237,207→