Gestion intégrée des zones côtières : risques et responsabilités
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La gestion intégrée des zones côtières impose de prendre en considération les espaces marins et terrestres. Ce territoire « entre-deux » est soumis plus que d’autres à un ensemble de risques, que les évolutions climatiques semblent renforcer pour certains. En s’appuyant sur une démarche interdisciplinaire et opérationnelle, il s’agit dans le cadre de ce hors-série de comprendre les enjeux que représentent les risques marins et côtiers, puis de déterminer, d’un point de vue juridique leur portée. Soutien au colloque et au dossier : Université du Littoral Côte d'Opale - Département de Droit, LARJEA 4030, Syndicat mixte Côte d'Opale, Communauté d'agglomération du Boulonnais, Boulogne sur Mer, Conservatoire de l'espace littoral et des rivages lacustres, Agences des aires marines protégées, Mutuelle d'assurance des instituteurs de France et [VertigO] - la revue électronique en sciences de l'environnement
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".