MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4229928569 · doi:10.1149/09707.0615ecst

Modeling Gas Diffusion Layers in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells Using a Continuum-Based Pore-Network Formulation

2020· article· en· W4229928569 on OpenAlexaff
Pablo A. García‐Salaberri, Iryna V. Zenyuk, Jeff T. Gostick, Adam Z. Weber

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryUniversidad Carlos III de Madrid
KeywordsGaseous diffusionMaterials scienceElectrolyteThermal diffusivityPermeability (electromagnetism)Work (physics)Porous mediumMechanicsParallelepipedDiffusionPorosityConvectionAnisotropyFuel cellsChemical engineeringThermodynamicsComposite materialChemistryElectrodeMembranePhysicsEngineeringGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiscale modeling of porous media in polymer electrolyte fuel cells is of paramount importance to improve predictions and assist the design of new materials. In this work, a composite-continuum-network formulation is presented to model species diffusion and convection in gas diffusion layers (GDLs). The model can be incorporated into CFD codes with moderate computational cost. The macroscopic model is based on a structured mesh composed of parallelepiped control volumes (CVs) and differential connectors (with negligible volume). The CV mesh embeds an internal structured pore network, which is used to determine analytically local anisotropic effective transport properties (effective diffusivity and permeability). The global structural parameters and effective transport properties predicted by the model are in good agreement with previous experimental data. Moreover, the results show that heterogeneities in the GDL can have significant influence on the fluxes from/to the catalyst layer, thus affecting local degradation rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.418
Threshold uncertainty score0.668

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207