CJP volume 45 issue 3 Cover and Front matter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Canadian Journal of Political Science, whose policy is set by the Editorial Board, is committed to the publication of scholarly research in all fields of political science.Manuscripts are assessed on the basis of their contribution to the discipline and by the authors' adherence to the highest scholarly standards.La Revue canadienne de science politique, dont la politique est mise en place par le comité de rédaction, s'engage à publier des travaux de recherche académique dans toutes les orientations de la science politique.Les manuscrits sont évalués sur la base de leur contribution à l'avancement des connaissances dans la discipline et selon la conformité des textes aux exigences académiques les plus élévées.The opinions and findings expressed in this Journal are not necessarily those of the Canadian Political Science Association or the Société québécoise de science politique or their respective Directors and Officers.Les opinions exprimées et les résultats de recherche transmis dans cette Revue n'engagent pas l'Association canadienne de science politique ou la Société québécoise de science politique, les membres de leur Bureau de direction et les membres de leur Conseil d'administration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.780 | 0.632 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".