Les configurations familiales, intimes et amicales des personnes aînées gaies et lesbiennes : continuités et transitions au cours du vieillissement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article explore les configurations familiales, intimes et amicales des personnes aînées gaies et lesbiennes ainsi que les changements qui peuvent les affecter au cours du vieillissement dans un contexte québécois. L’analyse est basée sur la réalisation de 22 entrevues individuelles semi-dirigées auprès d’adultes vieillissants gais et lesbiennes âgés de 60 à 76 ans, provenant d’une recherche doctorale. Les principaux résultats portent sur les pratiques et les significations associées à la vie intime, aux relations familiales et amicales, ainsi que sur les transitions au cours du vieillissement. L’analyse des résultats suggère de prendre en considération l’ensemble du réseau social des personnes aînées gaies et lesbiennes dans le champ de la famille et en travail social afin d’être en mesure de comprendre leurs réalités et de répondre à leurs besoins dans les pratiques sociales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".