Step Change Towards A Zero Incident Work Environment - Managing The Human Factor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Step Change Towards a Zero Incident Work Environment— Managing the Human Factor P. J. Grant; P. J. Grant Equilibria Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar L. M. Senior; L. M. Senior Equilibria Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar J. H. Lake J. H. Lake Equilibria Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Health, Safety and Environment Conference and Exhibition, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, September 2005. Paper Number: SPE-95346-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/95346-MS Published: September 19 2005 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Grant, P. J., Senior, L. M., and J. H. Lake. "Step Change Towards a Zero Incident Work Environment— Managing the Human Factor." Paper presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Health, Safety and Environment Conference and Exhibition, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, September 2005. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/95346-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Asia Pacific Health, Safety, Security, Environment and Social Responsibility Symposium Search Advanced Search Abstract Safety results within the oil & gas industry have shown continuous improvement in the last decade, with particular focus placed on the equipment and process elements. The challenges faced in reaching and maintaining a zero incident work environment will now hinge around managing the "human factor" whilst also maintaining the equipment and process standards achieved to date. To influence the results we will have to influence the people.In 1999, we presented a paper in the Aberdeen SPE conference based upon a proactive observation and feedback process – people were the focus. In 2004, at the SPE Calgary SPE conference we presented a paper on Performance Leadership Coaching, again focusing on the potential of fully appreciating the human factor.Now, after extensive research and testing involving over 2000 workers, the ability to better manage the "human factor" has been uncovered, and a method for practical application established using the "e- colours process". We have developed and refined a process for using personality traits, not only as a communication tool but also as a risk management tool. This methodology is being tried and tested offshore today.It has always been stated that there is no "silver bullet" when it comes to safety. Yet we all seek the next step change in safety excellence and the results that goal implies. If indeed we are to make the paradigm shift required then it will only come through taking the time and effort to understand human being's actions and reactions, in a context that any roustabout, roughneck or supervisor, can appreciate while working on the job at hand.What has become evident through our extensive research in the field, offshore, is a clear picture of an element that has eluded us in the past.People of the same personality traits and tendencies (identified by us using the e-colours) do in fact, have the same approach to safety and their perception of risk tolerance, even to a point of predicting, when asked, how they could get hurt.This process very much supports the ethos of the SPE conference which is founded upon "Living and Working in Harmony". This can only be achieved by understanding the people with whom we work.We have some clear examples of how this process works and indeed how lives could have been saved if utilised. Keywords: presentation, equilibria, rig manager, colour combination, information, drilling equipment, tendency, incident work environment, spe 95346, human factors Subjects: Drilling Equipment, Health, Safety, Offshore drilling units, Ergonomics, Human factors (engineering and behavioral aspects) Copyright 2005, Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".