MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4230015517 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10501506.2

Climate-modulated nutrient conditions along the Labrador Shelf: Evidence from nitrogen isotopes in a six-hundred-year-old crustose coralline alga

2020· preprint· en· W4230015517 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John M. Doherty, B. Williams, Esme Kline, Walter H. Adey, Benoît Thibodeau

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science Foundation of Sri LankaUniversity Research Committee, University of Hong Kong
KeywordsOceanographyCrustoseNutrientNitrateNorth Atlantic oscillationEnvironmental scienceOcean currentClimate changeGeologyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The impacts of climate change on North Atlantic nutrient chemistry remain poorly understood, as there exist a multitude of rapidly-changing biological and physical drivers of nutrient conditions throughout the region. Here, we present nitrogen isotope measurements derived from a six-hundred-year-old crustose coralline alga (δ15Nalgal) to elucidate historic and contemporary trends in Labrador Shelf nitrate utilization, defined as the degree of biological nitrate uptake relative to supply. Prior to ~1800, periods during which utilization approached completion corresponded to neutral modes of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, which we argue promoted favorable oceanographic conditions for simultaneous phytoplankton growth and reduced nitrate input. More recently, nearly-complete utilization occurred concomitantly with a weakened Labrador Current, suggesting reduced nutrient inflow from eastern subpolar waters. These results highlight the role of ongoing climate-induced circulation changes in driving nutrient distributions throughout the subpolar North Atlantic, which may have implications for future fisheries and oceanic carbon storage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarine and coastal ecosystems→French-language works237,207→